GaryM I don't know the details of his situation and assume you don't either and of course there is always two sides to a story but......if you were to rewrite what you have posted here with the genders reversed how do you think that would be received by the public?
First, I never said his wife (ex) is a nice person. No comment on it. Simply that based on his words, and admissions he didnt realise he made, the situation is his own making. Its certainly not reason to put responsibilities in schoolgirls with short skirts.
But on that. A woman, lets say elderly and rich. Marries a 30 year old male who later leaves and wants his settlement. Hes a deadset lowlife scumbag, just as the posters wife MIGHT be, that has not broken any laws and no law needs to exist to protect you from yourself. If the lady now says I was taken in, tough IMO. It happens all the time. Its just less common because it takes more to sucker a woman in. Not because they are smarter, they tend to think less with their furry checquebook. Use it sure, some are just stubs now, but thats not the same.
I dont think a man, or woman who is taken in, deserves a do over. Most cant let it go because they are now trying to overcome the sense of embarrassment now the spell is broken, and they feel stupid, vitimised even. But they are 99% victims of their own making.
Right on cue Gary.
Got me figured out in three posts - legend!
I almost hope you get to experience what I've been through buddy.
I'll bet you will change your tune.
So you're saying it was my fault I married a gold digger for her personal fun and profit and that women don't "stitch" men up?
Get off the drugs mate.
The feminazis have taken away all "control" - as you put it - from men.
How can you possibly consider this to be "fair" to half the World's population?
"Leave when it's off " you say? Yep, just pack up and lose everything to her.
"If you want a refuge, fine, admit you cant stand on your own feet. That's what a refuge does, even if not said. But it is the stated reason for refuges, women traditionally (a tad outdated now) could not leave as they had no income, or income support and rarely had enough savings to set themselves up. Moreover, women often couldnt get rentals or utilities in their name."
Ummm - back in the 50s maybe. Hello! 2018 wake up call. Doesn't wash mate.
Family Law Act was bastardised under Labor by Lionel Murphy and Alastair Nicholson in '78.
That's 40 years of this lefticle sexist anti-male crap.
Playing the old "mysogeny" card huh? Thought that died out with Julia G.
"Racist card" next maybe?
Are you playing with a full deck?
You seem to have some ill-conceived perception that women are better than men and can do no wrong.
You Sir, are a victim of feminazi propaganda.
Politics = the manipulation of the population.
You are also filthy guilty of blaming the victim as in my case, no more and no less than "She dressed like a slut, she deserved it" blames a girl in a short skirt for provoking unwanted attention from men.
Maybe stay away from the ABC for a while and go back to Uni and finish that Bachelor of Arts Diploma?
I've seen long-drops fuller than you, but not often.
Politics equals the system that gives us currency, roads, cars, business, goods, income. But whatever mate.
I have a proper interpretation of your words. You have a preconceived notion that young schoolgirls need to accept responsibility for your choice in wife. Reread your first post, then put it in context of the topics, Ill wait.
I don’t care if your wife saw you coming, wrote to her sister how she found a live one and would take him for all hes worth. She could connive and conjure over a cauldren, it changes nothing about your inability to make good choices.
Am I playing with a full deck? Lets see. I said leave long before its toxic. Youre response is to argue now that the chance to keep your stuff is well past (you know, where you know better than to marry some eye candy), that you want to keep your stuff despite the law going to roger you if you try? And then complain now you’ve been rodgered. And once again you blame everyone else on the planet. Well yeah I am playing with a full deck, but not the Mother Goose deck youre playing with. Are you ever responsible for yourself? At all, just once?
You married her, she was always going to have legal rights, even in the 50s. Its going to be toxic, get out and let the lawyers sort it out. If you do not make it worse, it can be much simpler than if you act the goat.
But again, like I said, theres a reason they seized your assets. Thats a fact. One of the things you said they did as if without cause. Blaming others again.
You typed all this sunshine. Full deck? LOL. Of course Ive got you sussed, I used your words to do it.
You put this post in response to schoolgirls and their short skirts, as if bitches they are all the same. Misogynist is not a feminazi term, or Julia Gillards, its just English, from ancient Greece. Its a very ancient term and predates the feminazi movement by several millennia. It describes your words, in their context. Its apt.
2018? Yeah I addressed it. You cant now take away the refuges that exist, it would be political suicide. Note it woudnt be political suicide if only feminazis believed it would be wrong. It’s much wider public opinion, democracy in action.