The SA Govt does provide something in return. The SA Desert Pass comes with maps and heaps of information which, it would appear, this family choose to ignore. I am hoping that this family did the right thing and did buy a desert pass because I have seen a lot out there who disn’t have a pass.South Australian/Queensland governments should be kicked in their back ends for happily taking the fees for access but providing nothing in return, perhaps compulsory vehicle recovery insurance at the point of entry as well as a roll call of people and vehicles in the desert at any given time, perhaps attaching removable GPS trackers with unique IDs.
It was never a life/death situation. It was only ever a vehicle recovery exercise.It is beyond the joke that someone can be left in the life/death situation 270 km from nearest town cause of friggin $$$$!
I disagree. It is a designated remote area. People are welcome to attempt it but it isn’t a computer game where you just hit the reset button when you stuff up. If it was easy everybody would go. This mentality has softened and overpopulated places like Fraser Island which had natural limits (middle rock, the jump up etc) which made parts of it extremely remote but were bypassed for access by the masses and look at it now. Hardly an improvement. Leave the Simpson a remote area.This was unfortunate event which was compounded by badly planned and executed action on all sides of the coin.
I was made aware that in the past one could hire a sat phone in Mt Dare for the desert crossing, is that not a case anymore?
When I done Simmo crossing 5 years ago we traveled with companions, had the sat phone on us which we actually used to call for help for someone else stuck with broken chassis about 75 kays from Birdsville.
Anyway what we encountered was even more astounding, we came across 2 French families (no pun intended they could barely communicate in English as well) with small kids (on separate occasions) in their hired Troppies with no sand flags, no radios of any kind and these people were plain and simple lucky. This was in middle of the season so technically it was a freeway out there with so many vehicles and tourists it was a disappointment for me at least....
The lesson here is that in both cases Mt Dare and Birdsville recovery services are sketchy, on the shoe string backyarders/amateurish operations budgets and indeed a last resort.
The family biggest mistake was that they had no means of clear communications with emergency providers. They were not really alone and there was enough support from fellow travellers which got them through.
What really needs to be looked at and seriously indeed for the authorities, motoring clubs, tourist organizations and insurance companies how to improve the recovery services in the area by either providing contractual type deals hence injecting necessary funds and also improve or indeed create a system of checks and balances in regards to all visitors to the area.
South Australian/Queensland governments should be kicked in their back ends for happily taking the fees for access but providing nothing in return, perhaps compulsory vehicle recovery insurance at the point of entry as well as a roll call of people and vehicles in the desert at any given time, perhaps attaching removable GPS trackers with unique IDs.
Ultimately relying on good will of overworked private operators with questionable equipment is a disaster waiting to happen. But then just look at the funding of emergency services in capital cities to see that the governments of all persuasion are happy to take the money but provide bare minimum.
It is beyond the joke that someone can be left in the life/death situation 270 km from nearest town cause of friggin $$$$!
Yeah I don’t know about that, that sounds like a nanny state type response to me.
This is not a picnic in the National Park type scenario it is remote outback travel and needs to be reiterated as such. The problem we have now is that 4WD’s are more popular than ever and we have every man and his dog in the media promoting these types of treks and they don’t get given the respect they deserve.
The current system works fine, the travelers need to be better prepared not the authorities playing wet nurse to the idiots
The SA Govt does provide something in return. The SA Desert Pass comes with maps and heaps of information which, it would appear, this family choose to ignore. I am hoping that this family did the right thing and did buy a desert pass because I have seen a lot out there who disn’t have a pass.
How much is complusory vehicle recovery insurance going to add to the cost of a desert pass?
And who bears the cost of GPS trackers and their monitoring cost?
It was never a life/death situation. It was only ever a recovery exercise.
Tink
No way sir, not for the nanny state type, but no offense to expect backyarders to assist is a joke! If you read the article which was probably more hyped up then it ought to be, the failure in establishing clear expectations as to what happens when things go South is absolutely screaming at everybody. The buck passing between Mt Dare and Birdsville operators was clear to see. This event was not a life and death situation even by the long shot but I guess there is a fatigue setting in from those operators especially when they have go out to totally preventable cases. Its a goodwill of those people there but it can no longer suffice.
Yes, part of the problem is that there are too many unaware motorist out there as to what outback travel entails but to have 3rd world emergency service in such scenarios is a joke on us! Very bad joke. The vehicles do break down even to those best prepared, what happens when assistance is required
As I mention, if they want it Wild West like scenario where everyone for himself then stop gouging money from those who go there. Put up the huge sign up and disclaimers and be done with it. But NO, the nanny state is already there: 3 m from ground up flag, pay us the king ransom so you can observe loose used toil paper scattered on every bush, can't do that there can't go there, not allowed that and what else.
If the relevant organizations/people got together and established some common sense what if scenarios "modus operandi" it would go a long way.
Be honest and admit what would you do if something like this happened to you out there, would you be happy with the service rendered for the cash they gouge you for? Paying 10 grand for crank sensor seems like overkill but that's what it usually comes down to....
Yes I'm fully aware of that but the possibility is/was there for that to occur. Those maps and the info is not worth $150. I haven't even opened those maps, anyway the price admission is simply a racket, gouging etc. If they were serious about it instead of just raking the cash how about $50 access fee + $30 recovery insurance + $20 optional/recommended maps .
I think we need to stop looking at what this family did wrong and start evaluating what happens when chit hits the fan.
Regards
Good stuff, made you laugh. Seriously though it would be interesting to see how many visitors go through Simmo and don't need any assistance/recovery and do cost scenario based on that. The user pays....$30 recovery insurance. Bahahaha. That is the funniest thing I have heard all week.
Tink
if a poacher cuts themselves climbing through my fence or breaks their ankle in the act of attempting to trespass on my property, with the sole intent of breaking the law, do yo know who pays...me, or in that case is why I need to purchase $20mil of public liability insurance.
Why do you bury the police?I am on the same boat as you, but I've put up a sign
"Trespassers, we don't call the police, we bury them"
![]()
That interpretation might be more intimidating to a potential trespasser.Why do you bury the police?
Supposedly people have the option of full insurance if they go with Club 4x4(?), if so that option is already covered.