Can anyone hear me, we’re in Trouble - The Australian Magazine 24-25 Nov

dno67

Well-Known Member
Even the purchase of a cheap hand held may have been enough to communicate clearly, l wish fool hardy people would stay at home in there backyard with there family.
No good blaming everything and everyone else for your failures.
 

Tink

Well-Known Member
South Australian/Queensland governments should be kicked in their back ends for happily taking the fees for access but providing nothing in return, perhaps compulsory vehicle recovery insurance at the point of entry as well as a roll call of people and vehicles in the desert at any given time, perhaps attaching removable GPS trackers with unique IDs.
The SA Govt does provide something in return. The SA Desert Pass comes with maps and heaps of information which, it would appear, this family choose to ignore. I am hoping that this family did the right thing and did buy a desert pass because I have seen a lot out there who disn’t have a pass.
How much is complusory vehicle recovery insurance going to add to the cost of a desert pass?
And who bears the cost of GPS trackers and their monitoring cost?
It is beyond the joke that someone can be left in the life/death situation 270 km from nearest town cause of friggin $$$$!
It was never a life/death situation. It was only ever a vehicle recovery exercise.
Tink
 

cam04

Well-Known Member
This was unfortunate event which was compounded by badly planned and executed action on all sides of the coin.
I was made aware that in the past one could hire a sat phone in Mt Dare for the desert crossing, is that not a case anymore?

When I done Simmo crossing 5 years ago we traveled with companions, had the sat phone on us which we actually used to call for help for someone else stuck with broken chassis about 75 kays from Birdsville.

Anyway what we encountered was even more astounding, we came across 2 French families (no pun intended they could barely communicate in English as well) with small kids (on separate occasions) in their hired Troppies with no sand flags, no radios of any kind and these people were plain and simple lucky. This was in middle of the season so technically it was a freeway out there with so many vehicles and tourists it was a disappointment for me at least....

The lesson here is that in both cases Mt Dare and Birdsville recovery services are sketchy, on the shoe string backyarders/amateurish operations budgets and indeed a last resort.

The family biggest mistake was that they had no means of clear communications with emergency providers. They were not really alone and there was enough support from fellow travellers which got them through.

What really needs to be looked at and seriously indeed for the authorities, motoring clubs, tourist organizations and insurance companies how to improve the recovery services in the area by either providing contractual type deals hence injecting necessary funds and also improve or indeed create a system of checks and balances in regards to all visitors to the area.

South Australian/Queensland governments should be kicked in their back ends for happily taking the fees for access but providing nothing in return, perhaps compulsory vehicle recovery insurance at the point of entry as well as a roll call of people and vehicles in the desert at any given time, perhaps attaching removable GPS trackers with unique IDs.

Ultimately relying on good will of overworked private operators with questionable equipment is a disaster waiting to happen. But then just look at the funding of emergency services in capital cities to see that the governments of all persuasion are happy to take the money but provide bare minimum.

It is beyond the joke that someone can be left in the life/death situation 270 km from nearest town cause of friggin $$$$!
I disagree. It is a designated remote area. People are welcome to attempt it but it isn’t a computer game where you just hit the reset button when you stuff up. If it was easy everybody would go. This mentality has softened and overpopulated places like Fraser Island which had natural limits (middle rock, the jump up etc) which made parts of it extremely remote but were bypassed for access by the masses and look at it now. Hardly an improvement. Leave the Simpson a remote area.
 

patrolgu4

Active Member
Yeah I don’t know about that, that sounds like a nanny state type response to me.
This is not a picnic in the National Park type scenario it is remote outback travel and needs to be reiterated as such. The problem we have now is that 4WD’s are more popular than ever and we have every man and his dog in the media promoting these types of treks and they don’t get given the respect they deserve.
The current system works fine, the travelers need to be better prepared not the authorities playing wet nurse to the idiots

No way sir, not for the nanny state type, but no offense to expect backyarders to assist is a joke! If you read the article which was probably more hyped up then it ought to be, the failure in establishing clear expectations as to what happens when things go South is absolutely screaming at everybody. The buck passing between Mt Dare and Birdsville operators was clear to see. This event was not a life and death situation even by the long shot but I guess there is a fatigue setting in from those operators especially when they have go out to totally preventable cases. Its a goodwill of those people there but it can no longer suffice.

Yes, part of the problem is that there are too many unaware motorist out there as to what outback travel entails but to have 3rd world emergency service in such scenarios is a joke on us! Very bad joke. The vehicles do break down even to those best prepared, what happens when assistance is required

As I mention, if they want it Wild West like scenario where everyone for himself then stop gouging money from those who go there. Put up the huge sign up and disclaimers and be done with it. But NO, the nanny state is already there: 3 m from ground up flag, pay us the king ransom so you can observe loose used toil paper scattered on every bush, can't do that there can't go there, not allowed that and what else.

If the relevant organizations/people got together and established some common sense what if scenarios "modus operandi" it would go a long way.

Be honest and admit what would you do if something like this happened to you out there, would you be happy with the service rendered for the cash they gouge you for? Paying 10 grand for crank sensor seems like overkill but that's what it usually comes down to....

The SA Govt does provide something in return. The SA Desert Pass comes with maps and heaps of information which, it would appear, this family choose to ignore. I am hoping that this family did the right thing and did buy a desert pass because I have seen a lot out there who disn’t have a pass.
How much is complusory vehicle recovery insurance going to add to the cost of a desert pass?
And who bears the cost of GPS trackers and their monitoring cost?

It was never a life/death situation. It was only ever a recovery exercise.
Tink

Yes I'm fully aware of that but the possibility is/was there for that to occur. Those maps and the info is not worth $150. I haven't even opened those maps, anyway the price admission is simply a racket, gouging etc. If they were serious about it instead of just raking the cash how about $50 access fee + $30 recovery insurance + $20 optional/recommended maps .
I think we need to stop looking at what this family did wrong and start evaluating what happens when chit hits the fan.
Regards
 

Albynsw

Well-Known Member
No way sir, not for the nanny state type, but no offense to expect backyarders to assist is a joke! If you read the article which was probably more hyped up then it ought to be, the failure in establishing clear expectations as to what happens when things go South is absolutely screaming at everybody. The buck passing between Mt Dare and Birdsville operators was clear to see. This event was not a life and death situation even by the long shot but I guess there is a fatigue setting in from those operators especially when they have go out to totally preventable cases. Its a goodwill of those people there but it can no longer suffice.

Yes, part of the problem is that there are too many unaware motorist out there as to what outback travel entails but to have 3rd world emergency service in such scenarios is a joke on us! Very bad joke. The vehicles do break down even to those best prepared, what happens when assistance is required

As I mention, if they want it Wild West like scenario where everyone for himself then stop gouging money from those who go there. Put up the huge sign up and disclaimers and be done with it. But NO, the nanny state is already there: 3 m from ground up flag, pay us the king ransom so you can observe loose used toil paper scattered on every bush, can't do that there can't go there, not allowed that and what else.

If the relevant organizations/people got together and established some common sense what if scenarios "modus operandi" it would go a long way.

Be honest and admit what would you do if something like this happened to you out there, would you be happy with the service rendered for the cash they gouge you for? Paying 10 grand for crank sensor seems like overkill but that's what it usually comes down to....



Yes I'm fully aware of that but the possibility is/was there for that to occur. Those maps and the info is not worth $150. I haven't even opened those maps, anyway the price admission is simply a racket, gouging etc. If they were serious about it instead of just raking the cash how about $50 access fee + $30 recovery insurance + $20 optional/recommended maps .
I think we need to stop looking at what this family did wrong and start evaluating what happens when chit hits the fan.
Regards

Not sure what fees they are gouging from you that they offer nothing in return?
I am not aware of any National Park in Australia that provides you with GPS trackers and offer a recovery service.
You aquire a permit for permission to enter an area nothing more, The rest is up to you to sort out and you are welcome to use whoever you choose to assist you, Mt Dare and Birdsville Roadhouse just happen to be the closest but it is not their responsibility
I have been in the Simpson more than a dozen times and had issues on two occasions and I had suitable comms with me to seek help from Birdville on one occasion and the other I contacted Mt Dare as they were closer, they advised me they were in the middle of a recovery and could not get to us for two days. They provided us with enough mechanical advice for us to do a bush repair and get out ourselves.
If we didn’t have a sat phone it would of been very different
 

patrolgu4

Active Member
$30 recovery insurance. Bahahaha. That is the funniest thing I have heard all week.
Tink
Good stuff, made you laugh. Seriously though it would be interesting to see how many visitors go through Simmo and don't need any assistance/recovery and do cost scenario based on that. The user pays....

It seems that the only crime this family has done is that their car broke down in the middle of the Simpson desert. If they didn't no one would bat an eyelid
Next time you're that way and your car breaks down I'm sure 4x4 Earth crowd will handsomely vilify you for being unprepared.....

What this case shows is the lack and inconsistency of emergency support in the area so buyer be aware.

Have a fun
 

Tink

Well-Known Member
Mate, been across twice. Both times carried a sat phone. First time, hired one. Not that expensive. Next time I had my own. Plus both times I carried a PLB with a registered trip plan.
And there is no lack of emergency support out there. There may be some issues with the coordination of vehicle recoveries but I was prepared for those contingencies with plenty of extra water and food.
Tink
 

mikehzz

Well-Known Member
I don't recall anyone perishing in the Simpson for yonks. Why do you need to change anything? Wouldn't it be cheaper to tar the track if we wanted to take away any element of danger. These people were inconvenienced, nothing more. Fair dinkum, people do stupid things and die all the time. I'm actually sick of everyone trying to wrap the world in cotton wool to try and prevent it. It's anti-evolutionary and allows idiots to breed.
 

Blue_haired_man

Well-Known Member
Wow, just wow. There’s now people on this 4WD forum whinging about the fact that when you are in the least populated area of Australia there should be a racq style recovery service and further insurance for in the middle of bum f Idaho. Do you know what would be cheaper? To close it.

Let me put this in perspective, I live on a rural block. If I bog the tractor, do you know who pays for recovery...me. If a poacher cuts themselves climbing through my fence or breaks their ankle in the act of attempting to trespass on my property, with the sole intent of breaking the law, do yo know who pays...me, or in that case is why I need to purchase $20mil of public liability insurance.

It’s pretty bloody simple to me, if you want to whinge and bitch about spending a few extra days in the Simpson because you. a, can’t communicate to organise the recovery, b, struggle to get the money together, or c, didn’t take the adequate provisions, I’m sorry but you can buy a deck of cards and a carton of your favourite piss and stay home. The emergency services monitored the situation and didn’t deem a rescue as necessary, and guess what...no one died, no one even required hospitalisation from my recollection of the article.

And as I said previously, now she reckons dingoes will get her in the hallway on the way to the shitter, yeah bloody right.

They should buy a Prius and head to west end next holiday
 

Kippie

Moderator
if a poacher cuts themselves climbing through my fence or breaks their ankle in the act of attempting to trespass on my property, with the sole intent of breaking the law, do yo know who pays...me, or in that case is why I need to purchase $20mil of public liability insurance.

I am on the same boat as you, but I've put up a sign

"Trespassers, we don't call the police, we bury them"
;)
 

Rhett HS

Well-Known Member
If we say the 25 recoveries per year mean a turnover of $250k per year, how much is too much to manage an insurance scheme for it? I dont think it stacks up yet, but its an interesting idea.

National parks could install a sign at each end making it clear that vehicle recoveries typically cost in the region of $10k, and half needs to be paid up front. Makes it more real to people.

National parks were organising a bore to be sunk on the rig road when i was there, to measure artesian water levels with respect to cattle farming. Building their case data. I dont know if that was paid by separate grants or who knows what, or the park fees.
 

Albynsw

Well-Known Member
Let’s keep this in perspective
The Simpson crossing is one of many remote tracks people travel on and by far the shortest in distance between civilisation
The system as it stands is the same as the rest of the country
Travellers need to prepare themselves accordingly
 

Rhett HS

Well-Known Member
Supposedly people have the option of full insurance if they go with Club 4x4(?), if so that option is already covered.
 

Les PK Ranger

4x4 Earth Contributer
Supposedly people have the option of full insurance if they go with Club 4x4(?), if so that option is already covered.

Yes, 2 levels I believe, but it has to paid by the vehicle owner at the time, and recouped from Club 4x4 later by way of claim.

So people need to make sure they can a) get recovery service where they are going, and b) be able to afford it up front and until whatever time it takes to make the claim and be reimbursed . . . or c) get themselves out of trouble with or without the help of fellow travelling companions.

Good preps helps prevent things, but stuff can just happen.
 
Top